London Wall/Museum of London roundabout changes only protect left turning cyclists

A week ago I was cycling along London Wall and past the Museum of London roundabout, and noticed some changes with paint and traffic cones. As you arrive at the roundabout you choose which side of the cones to go on depending on whether you are turning left or taking the straight on or right exit. Left turn cyclists are given protection by the paint and traffic cones, whilst the straight on or right turn cyclists are mixing with motor vehicles.

SAM_7115

Then on the roundabout left turn cyclists are expected to give way to other cyclists coming round the roundabout as they about to exit the roundabout. Are these give way lines really needed? Can’t cyclists nicely merge together without needing to have priorities like motor vehicles require? There is enough space to have 2 cyclists side by side without impacting motor vehicle traffic, thus this shouldn’t be an issue.

SAM_7110

SAM_7106

Most importantly I’d like to question why cyclists who are not turning left are expected to mix with motor traffic? This is not going to help encourage inexperienced cyclists to use the roundabout. Will the cones stay there long term? Or will the cones be removed with motor vehicle drivers simply ignoring the white paint? Could drivers complain at cyclists going straight on or turning right for not using the cycling facility (i.e. being to the left of the cones/paint)?

Why not follow the tried and tested Dutch designs for roundabouts since there’s plenty of space? Both David Hembrow and Mark from Bicycle Dutch have blog posts explaining Dutch roundabouts, thus I won’t go into detail here.

icon-car.pngKML-LogoFullscreen-LogoQR-code-logoGeoJSON-LogoGeoRSS-LogoWikitude-Logo
London Wall/Museum of London

loading map - please wait...

London Wall/Museum of London 51.517569, -0.096892

12 thoughts on “London Wall/Museum of London roundabout changes only protect left turning cyclists

  1. Pingback: Shaun McDonald (@smsm1)

  2. Bill G

    I use this road on my commute home. I turn left from London Wall on to St Martins Le-Grand prior to joining Little Britain to cut thru’ to Smithfields and Clerkenwell. Over xmas the road was quiet enough for me to turn left in the new lane and then cut across two lanes of on-coming traffic to enter Little Britain.
    This evening traffic will be returning to normal levels and I shall find out if this manoeuvre is still practical or if I have to turn left from outside the lane and ride into the outside lane before turning into Little Britain.

    Reply
  3. Kevin Cordina

    I cycle this road every day and find the new layout horrible. I turn left towards St Pauls, so have the best of it, but it’s still ugly. The bit that scares me the most is the big blob of white paint on the roundabout itself which seems supposed to create some kind of merge zone for cyclists, but actually seems to function solely to funnel cars straight into the cycle lane. The reduction to one way is also creating tailbacks along London wall as traffic merges – I can see once the cones go away that cars will simply encroach on the lanes. It’s never been a good roundabout, but this seems to have made it worse.

    Reply
  4. Nick J

    I cycle out of London Wall into Aldersgate Street every morning, and from Aldersgate Street into St. Martin’s Le Grand every evening, and I find these changes outright dangerous.

    Especially coming from London Wall, there is now one column of traffic, and cars turning left force cyclists along with them, because straight-going cyclists are still to the left of cars!

    On top of that, the merging of the two lanes on London Wall is way too late, so that many cars basically stay in the cycling lane, knowing that they’ll turn in a few meters.

    Reply
  5. kevin cordina

    Not sure my earlier comment made it – the new marks westbound on London Wall have vanished this morning, leaving nothing but some burnt-off and damaged tarmac.

    Reply
      1. Alex Ingram (@nuttyxander)

        I emailed City of London about this roundabout and had the following reply:

        ==
        The City of London is trialling a new layout at the Museum of London roundabout to make the junction safer. The junction is being monitored daily for performance and safety. According to recent data, this junction is the City of London’s fourth most dangerous junction. In the last 3 years, there were 14 collisions and 9 of those injured were cyclists.

        This low cost trial seeks to make the junction safer whilst a major project is being developed to improve the whole area. Making dangerous junctions safer is a significant component of the City of London’s Road Danger Reduction Plan.

        Local occupiers were consulted on this trial and the scheme was presented to the City’s Streets and Walkways Committee for approval.

        The resultant westbound delays on London Wall were much greater than envisaged causing issues with the network work resilience and increased the risk of collisions at other sections. The monitoring results of this trial at the roundabout are scheduled to be presented to the next Streets and Walkway’s Committee.

        To reduce the risk of the trial at the roundabout being totally decommissioned. Restoring two lanes westbound on London Wall was considered necessary to provide a better balance between traffic movement and road safety. We acknowledge that the current layout is not ideal for cyclists, however, we believe it is an improvement from what was before the trial. As 11 of 14 collisions were recorded in the north-eastern corner of the roundabout where the trial facilities for cyclists have been retained.

        No further changes are planned and we hope to have an extension to our trial period of the roundabout layout.
        ==

        I also suggested a site visit, which they are open to, a more recent tweet says the revised layout will be in place and monitored for three months. https://twitter.com/squarecyclists/status/571254030372118528
        I think a site visit should be combined with examining the quietway route due to go on the nearby route by barbican by the end of 2016. This should be publicised in a month or two.

        I videoed the original layout whilst it was in place: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_j6BFgI8wXk

        Reply
  6. Bill G

    I initially disliked the new layout but I missed it last night. Vehicle traffic was moving faster and closer to the kerb, and I was unable to filter past the queues of traffic at the entrance to the roundabout because black cabs were tucked as close to the kerb as possible.
    As I entered the roundabout traffic was also moving faster (more space, higher speed?) so making my right hand turn into Little Britain was more fraught than usual.

    Reply
  7. Pingback: @nuttyxander

  8. Gordon Jackson

    Has anyone cycling in this area worked out what to do when you want to get from Chiswell Street, down Wood Street and across London Wall, heading towards Gresham Street?

    Travelling south-bound down Moor Lane and onto Fore Street, the new building works for London Wall Place have closed off Wood Street as you head towards London Wall. There doesn’t appear to be a safe/non-long-way-round route to get from (e.g. Finsbury Square), to the south bit of Wood Street (you cannot turn right out of Fore Street, you cannot travel south along Moorgate to London Wall etc) that doesn’t involve completely circumventing the entirety of Barbican. .

    Only solution I’ve found is to ignore the ‘Road Closed’ signs on Wood Street, mount the pavement and push your bike over the pedestrian refuge on London Wall, then re-mount at the Pret at Wood Street.

    Reply
  9. Pingback: Alex Ingram (@nuttyxander)

Leave a Reply